Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3252 (ALL)

LAVI TYAGI @ AKASH TYAGI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/16163/2026 · 2026-05-05

Saurabh Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 16163 of 2026 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State. 2. The instant application has been preferred for seeking quashing of charge-sheet dated 06.03.2025, cognizance/summoning order dated 18.06.2025 and the entire proceeding of Case No.297 of 2025, under sections 126(2), 74, 78, 352, 351(2) BNS against applicant no.1 and under sections 126(2), 78, 352, 351(2) BNS against applicant no.2, arising out of Case Crime No.36 of 2025, P.S. Madhuban Bapudham, District- Ghaziabad, pending in the court of learned ACJM- 4, Ghaziabad. 3. On perusal of entire record appended with the instant application, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned charge-sheet, cognizance/summoning order and entire criminal proceedings of the said case, can be set aside. 4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused. 5. Lastly, learned counsel for applicants submitted that liberty may be granted to applicants to surrender before the court concerned and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no objection. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jitendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Lavi Tyagi @ Akash Tyagi And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicants surrender before the court concerned within a period of 15 days from today and apply for bail, their bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. and Another, reported in 2021 (10) SCC 773. 7. However, it is made clear that till 15 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against applicants herein in pursuance of aforesaid case. May 6, 2026 Saif NA528 No. 16163 of 2026 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad