- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010645852023 NC: 2026:KHC:43301-DB CCC No. 1222 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1222 OF 2023 BETWEEN: 1. SMT SUBBAMMA W/O LATE RAMAKRISHNASPPA, AGED 67 YEARS 2. SRI R RAVI KUMAR S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNASPPA, AGED 45 YEARS, BOTH RESIDING AT NO.80 JAKKUR LAKE ROAD, JAKKKUR POST, YELHANKA, BANGALORE - 560064 …COMPLAINANTS (BY SRI. NISHAN G K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHRI TUSHAR GIRI NATH COMMISSIONER, BBMP, N R SQURE, HUDSON CIRCLE, BENGALURU 560002 Digitally signed by PAVITHRA B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010645852023 NC: 2026:KHC:43301-DB CCC No. 1222 of 2023 2. MOHAMMED NAYEEM MOMIN THE JOINT COMMISSONER, BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE YELAHANKA SUB DIVISION, BYTARAYANAUPRA, BANGALORE - 560064 …ACCUSED (BY SRI. PRASHANTH S H., ADVOCATE FOR A1 & A2) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHERE IN SHE PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE COURT BE PLEASED TO ORDER THAT THE ACCUSED ARE GUILTY OF CONTEMPT OF COURT FOR VIOLATION OF THE ORDER DATED 08.06.2023 PASSED BY THE HONBLE COURT IN WP NO.3014/2022 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-B AND CONSEQUENTLY IMPOSE MAXIMUM PUNISHMENT TO THE ACCUSED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971. THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.P.VIVEKANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN) Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the accused that an endorsement dated 02.08.2025 has been - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010645852023 NC: 2026:KHC:43301-DB CCC No. 1222 of 2023 issued rejecting the representation submitted by the complainant, in view of the fact that the direction issued in W.P.No.3014/2022 was only to consider the representation at Annexure-F and to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. 3. We are of the opinion that the direction stands substantially complied with and that the remedy available to the complainant is to challenge the said endorsement, if so advised. 4. Accordingly, liberty is reserved to the complainant to challenge the endorsement, keeping all contentions of the parties open. The contempt proceedings are accordingly dropped. Notice, if any, stands discharged. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (T.P.VIVEKANANDA) JUDGE AG, List No.: 3 Sl No.: 18