107 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No.7383 of 2026 Date of Decision: 22.07.2026 Puneet Khanna …..Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL ***** Present:- Ms. Archana Arora Rau, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ravinder Singh, DAG, Punjab. VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner and the petitioner, who has appeared through video-conference, submits that on account of the Dharna etc., the petitioner has shifted his place of operation as a result of which he does not wish to press the instant writ petition and he may be permitted to withdraw the same. 2. In view of the statement given by learned counsel for the petitioner and the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) July 22, 2026 JUDGE Yag Dutt Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No YAG DUTT 2026.07.22 18:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.