Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32507 (PAT)

Alok Kumar @ Bhuneshwar Bhagat v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./5232/2026 · 2026-02-11

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5232 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2025 Thana- PAKRIDAYAL District- East Champaran ====================================================== Alok Kumar @ Bhuneshwar Bhagat S/O Nathuni Bhagat R/o Village-Majhar Tola Jokaha P.S-Pakaridayal District-East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Ms. Ranjana Srivastava , Advocate For the State : Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 11-02-2026 Heard Ms. Ranjana Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.. 3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on account of previous enmity, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, assaulted father of informant by means of lathi and danda. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. On account of previous enmity, simple Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5232 of 2026(2) dt.11-02-2026 2/3 maar-peet took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against the petitioner. It is further submitted that co-accused Nand Kishore Bhagat, having similar and identical allegations, has already been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail by this Hon’ble Court vide order dated 01.11.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 72622 of 2025. Petitioner claims clean antecedents. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation, case and counter-case between the parties, claim based on parity and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed. 7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., East Champaran at Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5232 of 2026(2) dt.11-02-2026 3/3 Motihari in connection with Pakaridayal P.S. Case No. 190 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T