Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32501 (CHH)

AJITESH DUTTA ROY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2125/2023 · 2026-08-19

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010146372023 2026:CGHC:37330 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2125 of 2023 Ajitesh Dutta Roy S/o Dr. Shyamal Dutta Roy Aged About 29 Years R/o Shyama Nagar, Janakpur Ward, Kanker, District- North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh, Pin Code- 494304 ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Housing And Environment, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Pin Code- 492002 2 - Collector, Kanker District- North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue), Kanker District- North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh 4 - Nazul Officer, Kanker District- North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh 5 - Inspector-In-Charge, Police Station- Kanker District- North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh 6 - Smt. Seema Patel W/o Shri Ajay Patel, R/o Shyama Nagar, Janakpur Ward, Kanker, District- North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh, Pin Code- 494304 7 - Rahul Yadav S/o Shri Suresh Yadav, R/o Shyama Nagar, Janakpur Ward, Kanker, District- North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh, Pin Code- 494304 8 - Ganesh Sahu @ Banti Sahu R/o Shyama Nagar, Janakpur Ward, Kanker, District- North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh, Pin Code- 494304 ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.08.20 17:28:41 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. S.B. Pandey, Advocate For State : Mr. Saumitra Kesharwani, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 20.08.2026 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance raised by the petitioner in the present petition does not subsist, as such, he does not wish to press the present writ petition and seeks liberty to file an appropriate petition, if the exigency so arises. 2. Learned State counsel has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file an appropriate petition, if the exigency so arises. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh