1 CGHC010412822025 2026:CGHC:37494 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 980 of 2025 1 - Asharam Dhruv S/o Late Budhari Aged About 68 Years R/o Village Nawagaon Venkat, Tahsil- Lormi, District Mungeli C.G. 2 - Visheshar Dhruv S/o Late Budhari Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Nawagaon Venkat, Tahsil- Lormi, District Mungeli C.G. 3 - Shatruhan Dhruv S/o Late Budhari Aged About 53 Years R/o Village Nawagaon Venkat, Tahsil- Lormi, District Mungeli C.G. 4 - Ramakant Dhruv S/o Late Budhari Aged About 21 Years R/o Village Nawagaon Venkat, Tahsil- Lormi, District Mungeli C.G. 5 - Anjali Dhruv D/o Late Budhari Aged About 19 Years R/o Village Nawagaon Venkat, Tahsil- Lormi, District Mungeli C.G. 6 - Sukhmani W/o Late Rakesh Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Nawagaon Venkat, Tahsil- Lormi, District Mungeli C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Mahavir Rajput S/o Shri Tikaram Rajput Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Nawagaon Venkat, Tahsil- Lormi, District Mungeli C.G. 2 - Rampal Rajput S/o Shri Tikaram Rajput Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Nawagaon Venkat, Tahsil- Lormi, District Mungeli C.G. 3 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, District Mungeli C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akath Kumar Yadav, Advocate For Respondent 1 & 2 : Mr. Ishan Verma, Advocate For Respondent No.3 : Ms. Isha Jajodia, P.L. for the State SUMIT KUMAR Digitally signed by SUMIT KUMAR Date: 2026.08.21 11:17:06 +0530 2 (Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agarawal, J.) Order on Board 20/08/2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the parties would submit that the plaint has been rejected by the learned trial Court on an application filed by the defendants under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC, and therefore, nothing survives for adjudication in the present writ petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that since the proceeding before the learned trial Court has already been terminated, he does not want to press the present writ petition. 3. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed, however, the petitioner is at liberty to take all available grounds in the appropriate proceedings. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE Sumit