Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32489 (CHH)

DINESH KUMAR TIWARI v. RAJA SHIKARI

MAC/298/2022 · 2026-08-20

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010022672022 2026:CGHC:37618 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 298 of 2022 1 - Dinesh Kumar Tiwari S/o Late Gajanand Aged About 60 Years Profession- Driver, R/o Sidyanpur, P.S. Kawardha, At Present Om Zone, Shubham Vihar, Bilaspur, P.S. Civil Line, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, (Chhattisgarh) Mob.No.- 9993738902, Pin- 495001, Driver Of Safari Vehicle- Cg 10 Fa-1810, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant versus 1 - Raja Shikari S/o Raju Shikari, Aged About 8 Years (Minor) Through His Father Raju Shikari S/o Mathura Prasad, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Matiyari Shikari Para, House No. 40, Ward No. 15, P.O. Jouji, P.S. Seepat, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)............(Claimant Before Learned Tribunal), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Manager, Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank, Headquarter Nehru Chowk Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Pin- 495001 (Registered Owner Of Vehicle Safari Cg 10 Fa 1810, Non Applicant No. 2, Before Learned Tribunal), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Zonal Manager United India Insurance Company Limited, Zonal Office- Gurukripa Towers, Second Floor, In Front Of Amber Automobiles, Vyapar Vihar, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Pin 495001. (Insurance Company Of Vehicle Safari Cg 10 Fa 1810/ Non-Applicant No. 3 Before Learned Tribunal), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Appellant : Mr. Jai Prakash Shukla, Advocate ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA 2 For Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhyuday Singh, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Judgment on Board 21.08.2026 1. After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he does not wish to press the present appeal. 2. No objection raised from the other side. 3. In view of the above submission, prays is allowed, this present appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Saxena