SHIVANI SONGRA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/8672/2026 · 2026-07-21
Virinder Aggarwal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32478 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32478 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-8672-2026 1 111 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-8672-2026 Date of decision: 21.07.2025 SHIVANI SONGARA AND ANOTHER ...Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Azad Khan, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Karan Veer Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana. ***** VIRINDER AGGARWAL
, J. (Oral)
1. Prayer in the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of appropriate directions to respondent Nos.1 to 3, to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners, who apprehend threat to their life at the hands of private respondents, and not to harass or interfere in the peaceful life of the petitioners.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are in live-in-relationship and are being threatened with dire consequences by the private respondents. Resultantly, a representation dated 15.07.2026 (Annexure P-3) was also made to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, District Palwal, Haryana for protection of their lives and liberty but in vain. Learned counsel submits that he would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, District Palwal, Haryana to look into their representation and take SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.22 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-8672-2026 2 appropriate steps at the earliest.
3. Notice of motion.
4. Mr. Karan Veer Singh, learned Sr. DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3.
5. In view of above, petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, District Palwal, Haryana, to provide necessary protection to the petitioners after considering threat perceptions to their life and liberty and to ensure that the life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents.
6. Pending application (s), if any, shall also stand disposed of (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 21.07.2026 JUDGE S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.22 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document