JAGROOP SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/4012/2026 · 2026-07-21
N S Shekhawat
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32476 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32476 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
306
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.-
CRM-M-4012-2026 (O&M)
Date of Decision : 21.07.2026
Jagroop Singh and Another
....Petitioners VERSUS State of Punjab and Another
....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SHEKHAWAT
Present: Ms. Kesar Arora, Advocate for
Mr. Umesh Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amit Rana, Sr. DAG Punjab. Mr. Aryan, Advocate for
Mr. Prateek Sodhi, Advocate for respondent No.2. -.- N.S.SHEKHAWAT J. (Oral)
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr. P.C for quashing of FIR No. 45, dated 11.03.2025, registered under Sections 125, 191(3), 190 of B.N.S and Section 25 of Arms Act, at Police Station Chheharata, Amritsar (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 15.01.2026 (Annexures P-2 and P-3). 2. Vide order dated 27.01.2026, this Court had directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate/trial Magistrate for getting their statements recorded with respect to the compromise dated 15.01.2026 (Annexures P-2 and P-3) . 3. Pursuant to aforesaid order, the parties have appeared before the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Amritsar and got their statements recorded. TRIPTI SAINI 2026.07.22 15:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-4012-2026 (O&M)
-2-
Report dated 20.04.2026 has been received whereby after recording the statements of the parties, the Court below has shown its satisfaction that the compromise is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the case file. 5. In the light of the satisfaction shown by the Court below and considering the offence for which the accused have been charged are not of serious nature, together with the fact that compromise will go a long way in ironing out the differences for betterment of future life of the parties and also in view of the law laid down in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543 and Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the present petition for quashing the FIR is allowed qua the petitioners. 6.
Resultantly, FIR No. 45, dated 11.03.2025, registered under Sections 125, 191(3), 190 of B.N.S and Section 25 of Arms Act, at Police Station Chheharata, Amritsar (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 15.01.2026 (Annexures P-2 and P-3) alongwith all consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners. 7. Pending application(s), if any, is/are disposed of. July 21, 2026
(N.S.SHEKHAWAT) tripti
JUDGE
Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking
Whether reportable
: Yes/No TRIPTI SAINI 2026.07.22 15:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document