Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3247 (CAL)

NIMAI MANDAL AND ORS v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM(A)/969/2025 · 2026-01-05

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

05.01.2026 Serial no. 66 [G.S.D] CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI CRM (A) 969 of 2025 In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C.. -And- In the matter of : Nimai Mandal & Ors. … Petitioner(s) Mr. S. Kumar … for the petitioner(s) Mr. Bhaskar Das … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that he has instruction not to proceed with the present application for Anticipatory Bail. Learned advocate for the State has produced the Case Diary. In view of the submissions advanced by the learned advocate for the petitioner, CRM (A) 969 of 2025 is dismissed as not pressed. However, the directions passed above will not in any way impede the investigating officer to take steps in accordance with law. 2 Case Diary is returned to the learned advocate for the State. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)