Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32463 (PNJ)

RAJESH KUMAR ALIAS RAJESH AND OTHERS v. COMMISSIONER GURUGRAM DIVISION, GURUGRAM AND OTHERS

CWP/13481/2026 · 2026-07-20

Pankaj Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-13481-2026 PHHC010721042026 126 CWP-13481-2026 Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh & ors. ...... Petitioners Versus Commissioner Gurugram Division, Gurugram & ors. ..... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN *** Present :- Mr. P.S.Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners. *** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 11.07.2025 (Annexure P-6) passed by the Commissioner, Gurugram Division, Gurugram, whereby the revision petition preferred by the petitioners was dismissed and the orders passed by the Assistant Collector 2nd Grade, Kadipur, District Gurugram, in the partition proceedings, including the issuance of Sanad Taksim, were affirmed, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom. 2 Counsel for the petitioners submits that no objections were filed against Naksha ‘Bey’ which was approved on 10.02.2023. Sanad Taksim was issued on 28.08.2023. It is only thereafter that the revision was instituted on 19.12.2023. POOJA SHARMA 2026.07.22 15:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-13481-2026 PHHC010721042026 3 Keeping in view that the petitioners opted not to file any objections against Naksha ‘Bey’, this Court finds no reason to entertain the present writ petition. 4 Petition stands disposed off. ( PANKAJ JAIN ) 20.07.2026 JUDGE Pooja Sharma-I Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No POOJA SHARMA 2026.07.22 15:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document