RAJESH KUMAR ALIAS RAJESH AND OTHERS v. COMMISSIONER GURUGRAM DIVISION, GURUGRAM AND OTHERS
CWP/13481/2026 · 2026-07-20
Pankaj Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32463 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32463 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-13481-2026 PHHC010721042026
126
CWP-13481-2026
Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh & ors.
...... Petitioners
Versus
Commissioner Gurugram Division, Gurugram & ors. ..... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN
***
Present :- Mr. P.S.Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners.
***
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)
The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 11.07.2025 (Annexure P-6) passed by the Commissioner, Gurugram Division, Gurugram, whereby the revision petition preferred by the petitioners was dismissed and the orders passed by the Assistant Collector 2nd Grade, Kadipur, District Gurugram, in the partition proceedings, including the issuance of Sanad Taksim, were affirmed, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom. 2
Counsel for the petitioners submits that no objections were filed against Naksha ‘Bey’ which was approved on 10.02.2023. Sanad Taksim was issued on 28.08.2023. It is only thereafter that the revision was instituted on 19.12.2023.
POOJA SHARMA 2026.07.22 15:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-13481-2026 PHHC010721042026
3
Keeping in view that the petitioners opted not to file any objections against Naksha ‘Bey’, this Court finds no reason to entertain the present writ petition. 4
Petition stands disposed off.
( PANKAJ JAIN ) 20.07.2026
JUDGE Pooja Sharma-I
Whether speaking/reasoned:
Yes/No
Whether reportable:
Yes/No POOJA SHARMA 2026.07.22 15:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document