Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32458 (MAD)

M/s.Hariram Constructions, v. The Secretary to Government,

WP/19228/2026 · 2026-06-02

Mohammed Shaffiq

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 19228 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 02-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ WP No. 19228 of 2026 M/s.Hariram Constructions, A Partnership Firm, Represented by its Managing Partner, R.Karthikeyan (42), Office at 200/6, Veerappampalayam Pirivu, Perundurai Main Road, Palayapalayam, Erode -638 052. ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Secretary to Government, Agriculture Department, Secretariate, Chennai -9. 2. The Commissioner of Agriculture Marketing and Agri business, Tamil Nadu State Agricultural Marking Board, No. 3, TNSAMB Building, CIPET Road, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai -600 032. 3. The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu State Agricultural Marketing Board, No. 3, TNSAMB Building, CIPET Road, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai -600 032. ..Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue Writ of Mandamus, directing third respondent to consider petitioner’s representation dated 21.02.2024 and direct him to take appropriate steps as prayed in the said representation. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19228 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 6 For Petitioner: Mr.V.S.Kesavan For Respondents: Mr. M.Guruprasad for Government ORDER The present writ petition has been filed for a direction to third respondent to consider petitioner’s representation dated 21.02.2024 and direct him to take appropriate steps as prayed in the said representation. 2. Petitioner is a construction firm, registered under the GST Act and was successful bidder for a contract awarded by the Tamil Nadu State Agricultural Marketing Board. He would submit that there was an increase in the GST rate for Works Contract services provided to the respondent department from 12 % to 18% with effect from 18.07.2022. Petitioner had complied with such demand and sough for reimbursement by way of his representation dated 21.02.2024. 3. Learned State Counsel for respondents would submit that the above representation would be considered and appropriate orders would be passed in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to petitioner, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19228 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 6 4. In view thereof, there shall be a direction to third respondent, to consider petitioner’s representation dated 21.02.2024 on its own merits and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to petitioner, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any views with regard to the merits of the case. 5. Accordingly, writ petition stands disposed of. There will be no order as to costs. 02-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No MRN https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19228 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 6 To 1. The Secretary to Government, Agriculture Department, Secretariate, Chennai -9. 2. The Commissioner of Agriculture Marketing and Agri business, Tamil Nadu State Agricultural Marking Board, No.3, TNSAMB Building, CIPET Road, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai -600 032. 3. The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu State Agricultural Marketing Board, No.3, TNSAMB Building, CIPET Road, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai -600 032. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19228 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 6 MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. MRN WP No.19228 of 2026 02-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19228 of 2026 __________ Page6 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis