Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32454 (PNJ)

MANJIT SINGH @ VICKY v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/26124/2026 · 2026-07-21

Jasjit Singh Bedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

209 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-26124-2026 Date of decision :21.07.2026 MANJIT SINGH @ VICKY ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Sahil Vashishat, Advocate and Ms. Harjit Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. M.S. Toor, Asstt. A.G., Punjab. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (ORAL) The petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 in case bearing FIR No.17 dated 11.02.2023 registered under Sections 15(c)-61-85 of NDPS Act (Sections 25-29-61-85 of NDPS Act added later on) at Police Station Amloh, District Fatehgarh Sahib. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 08.05.2026, the petitioner has joined the investigation to the entire satisfaction of the Investigating Officer. The learned State counsel on instructions admits the aforesaid fact and submits that the petitioner is no more required for further investigation in the case. In view of aforesaid factual position, the interim order dated 08.05.2026 is made absolute. However, the petitioner shall keep on JITESH LAL 2026.07.22 11:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-26124-2026 -2- joining the investigation as and when required to do so and he shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) BNSS. Petition stands disposed of. (JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE 21.07.2026 JITESH Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No JITESH LAL 2026.07.22 11:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document