Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32453 (KAR)

MR. N. NANJUNDADIAH v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR

WP/12710/2022 · 2026-07-28

M G S Kamal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010283642022 NC: 2026:KHC:39405 WP No. 12710 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 12710 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MR. N. NANJUNDADIAH AGED 49 YEARS S/O LATE S NARAYANAPPA NO. 408, "A" BLOCK, BRIGADE GATE WAY APARTMENT DR. RAJ KUMAR, 2ND STAGE, RAJAJINAGAR MALLESHWARAM WEST BANGALORE - 560 086. 2. MR. KISHORE KUMAR S/O NANJUNDAIAH AGED 23 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 408, "A" BLOCK, BRIGADE GATE WAY APARTMENT DR. RAJ KUMAR, 2ND STAGE, RAJAJINAGAR MALLESHWARAM WEST BANGALORE - 560 086. M.NO. 9686274939 EMAIL: kishorekumar.kk691@gmail.com. 3. SMT. PRAVEEN N W/O NANJUNDAIAH AGED 44 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 408, "A" BLOCK, BRIGADE GATE WAY APARTMENT Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010283642022 NC: 2026:KHC:39405 WP No. 12710 of 2022 DR. RAJ KUMAR, 2ND STAGE, RAJAJINAGAR MALLESHWARAM WEST BANGALORE - 560 086. EMAIL: kishorekumar.kk691@gmail.com. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA K, ADVOCATE) AND: DEPUTY DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT 3RD FLOOR, B BLOCK, BMTC BUILDING, SHANTINAGAR - TTMC K.H. ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 027, EMAIL ID: parashivamurthy.mk@nic.in PH.NO. 080-22537823 …RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED EVICTION NOTICE AND NOTICE FOR TAKING POSSESSION DTD.20.6.2022 IN ECIR/BGZO/20/2020 ANENXUR-A AND A1 AS ILLEGAL AND ABINITIO AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010283642022 NC: 2026:KHC:39405 WP No. 12710 of 2022 ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 28.07.2026 seeking withdrawal of the writ petition, which reads as under: "The Petitioners have preferred the above petition and sought for quashing of possession notice. The Petitioners submits that during the pendency of the above petition the Appellate tribunal had confirm the Adjudication order. Hence it is prayed that the above petition is infructuous not survive for consideration. The Petitioner is permit me to withdraw the above petition." 2. Memo is placed on record. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE SPV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31