02.03.2026 Ct. No.6 D/L 92 Mujahid In The High Court At Calcutta Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction CRM (NDPS) 139 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Dinhata P.S. Case No. 535 of 2025 dated 03.11.2025 under Sections 20(C)/29/31 of the NDPS Act, 1985. And In the matter of: Parimal Barman ….Petitioner Mr. Sudip Guha Mr. Ananda Paul Ms. Ankita Nag …for the petitioner Mr. Aditi Shankar Chakraborty, Ld. APP Mr. Nilay Chakraborty, Ld. APP Mr. Aniruddha Biswas …for the State 1. The case of the prosecution is that YABA tablets 90 grms was recovered from the possession of Samim Haque, the name of the present petition and another co-accused Samit Das came in the testimony of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 2nd February, 2026. Learned counsel submits that Samit Das has been admitted to bail by this court vide order dated 27th February, 2026 in CRM (NDPS) 142 of 2026. 3. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the bail application. However, he fairly submits that no recovery was effect from the petitioner. 4. The court considered the submissions. Admittedly, no recovery was effected from the present petitioner. 2 5. Learned counsel for the State submits that as per record available, it came in the evidence of Samim Haque that he purchased the articles from this present petitioner. However, there is no evidence of call details record or any other transactions between the petitioner and Samim Haque. 6. Thus, taking into the account and facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, namely, Parimal Barman be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 1st Court (NDPS), Cooch Behar, subjection to the condition that the petitioner join the investigation as when directed the investigating officer. The petitioner shall not threaten, intimidate or tamper the complainant or members of the family in any manner whatsoever. The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the learned trial court until further orders. In case the petitioner violates any such condition the prosecution is at liberty to move an application for cancellation of bail. 7. The application for bail is allowed. 8. CRM (NDPS) 139 of 2026 stands disposed of. 9. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, duly applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all usual requisite formalities. (Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)