Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32446 (MAD)

Sree Baagyalakshmi Farm Service v. The Deputy State Tax Officer-II,

WP/20895/2026 · 2026-06-11

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 20895 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11.06.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 20895 of 2026 and W.M.P. Nos.22562 and 22563 of 2026 Sree Baagyalakshmi Farm Service Represented by its Proprietrix, Ms.V.Padmavathy, No.800, Nehuruji Road, Villupuram-605 602. ..Petitioner Vs The Deputy State Tax Officer-II, Villupuram-II Assessment Circle, Villupuram. ..Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings of the Respondent in GSTIN 33BMLPP0620H1ZA/2021-22, culminating in the Assessment Order dated 08.12.2025, passed under Section 73 of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017, bearing Reference No. ZD331225104757J, along with the consequential Form GST DRC-07 dated 08.12.2025 and quash the impugned proceedings as passed contrary to the provisions of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017, and against the principles of natural justice. For Petitioner: Mr.Rajkumar P For Respondent: Mr.L.Gokulraj, Government Counsel (Tax) ORDER An order dated 08.12.2025 is assailed primarily on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 20895 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 3 2. Mr.L.Gokulraj, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice for the respondent. 3. The period of limitation for filing an appeal has expired. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 25% of the disputed tax demand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle. 4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. 5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 11.06.2026 Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No mmi To The Deputy State Tax Officer-II, Villupuram-II Assessment Circle, Villupuram. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 20895 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 3 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. mmi WP No. 20895 of 2026 11.06.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis