IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (106) CRWP-8633-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:-21.07.2026 SUMIT KUMAR … Petitioner Versus STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Abhinav Gupta, Add. PP. UT, Chandigarh. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral) 1. Case has been called twice since morning. None is present on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Learned Counsel for the U.T, Chandigarh on instructions from Head Constable, Surinder, submitted that the statement of the petitioner was recorded at PGI, Chandigarh wherein the petitioner stated that he does not want any police action in the matter. So, it seems that petitioner is not interested in pursuing the petition. 3. In view of this, the instant petition is dismissed. 4. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 21st July, 2026 JUDGE Poonam Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No POONAM 2026.07.22 11:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document