Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3244 (JHR)

JAHIR ANSARI ALIAS ZAHEER ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2747/2026 · 2026-04-06

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(2026:JHHC:9517) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 2747 of 2026 Jahir Ansari @ Zaheer Ansari, aged about 40 years, s/o Maniruddin Ansari, r/o village – Kathoun (Najir Tola), PO & PS – Poreyahat, District – Godda. … … …Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … …Opp. Party ------ For the Petitioner : Ms. Vani Kumari, Advocate : Ms. Jagriti, Advocate For the State : Mr. V.S. Sahay, Addl. P.P. ------ HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ Order No:- 02, Dated:- 06th April, 2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved before this Court for grant of bail in connection with Poraiyahat P.S. Case No. 15 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 351(2), 352/3(5) of the BNS, 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused person attempted to commit murder of Md. Arshad Ansari by assaulting him with iron rod and boulder. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 11 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 08.02.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 1 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Godda, in connection with Poraiyahat P.S. Case No. 15 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Aditi