Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 10437 of 2026 Anadi Mahal ..... Petitioner Mr. M.K. Mohanty, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Another ..... Opposite Parties Mr. S. Das, ASC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 10.04.2026 Order No. 1 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. On the oral prayer made by the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, he is permitted to implead the Director-cum-Addl. Secretary, Housing and Urban Development Department, Bhubaneswar as Opp. Party No.3 in Court. 3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties. 4. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- The Petitioner most respectfully prays that the Hon’ble Court may be graciously pleased to allow the writ petition, issue a writ of a writ or direction in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction to the Opp. Parties to regularise the service of the Petitioner as Orderly Peon of the Executive Officer w.e.f 01.01.1994 and give him all the consequential and financial benefits and pass such other or Page 2 of 2. further order or orders as are deemed just and proper 5. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.3 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of 3(three) weeks hence. 6. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No.3 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of 3(three) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No.3 be communicated to the Petitioner. 7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Sangita