212-3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- CRM-M-36511-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 21.07.2026 Karanbir Singh ....Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab ....Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SHEKHAWAT Present: Mr. Ritesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- N.S.SHEKHAWAT J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to him in case FIR No.83 dated 17.05.2026, registered under Sections 115(2), 118(2), 3(5) BNS (corresponding Sections 323, 326, 34 IPC) at Police Station City Sekhwan, District Batala (Gurdaspur). 2. While granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail by this Court on 09.07.2026, the following contentions were noticed by this Court and the same have been reproduced below:- “Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the complainant and the petitioner are closely related to each other and a land dispute is pending between both the parties. He further submits that it was a case of version and cross version and from the MLR (Annexure P-2), it is apparent that Harpal Kaur, mother of the petitioner had also suffered injuries on her person. He further submits that it has been wrongly shown that the petitioner was armed with a dattar and had caused injury TRIPTI SAINI 2026.07.22 15:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-36511-2026 (O&M) -2- on the right elbow of the complainant and the injury was declared to be grievous in nature. He further submits that the question of aggressor is yet to be decided by the Trial Court, during trial. Learned counsel further submits that Jasmail Singh, co-accused has been granted the concession of interim anticipatory bail by this Court.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has reiterated the submissions and further submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation may not be required. 4. Learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no longer required for further investigation. 5. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is allowed and the interim order dated 09.07.2026, passed by this Court is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. 6. Pending application(s), if any, is/are disposed of. July 21, 2026 (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) tripti JUDGE Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : Yes/No TRIPTI SAINI 2026.07.22 15:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document