Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32425 (KAR)

SU MURALI MOHAN, v. THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSION COURT

WP/23401/2026 · 2026-08-18

Ashok S Kinagi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010515602026 NC: 2026:KHC:44340 WP No. 23401 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 23401 OF 2026 (S-RES) BETWEEN: 1. S.U. MURALI MOHAN S/O UJJINAPPA .S AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS WORKING AS FIRST DIVISION ASSISTANT (FDA) OFFICE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARAPANAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT. R/AT NO. 856/33, BASAVESHWARA SADANA NEAR GOVT, HOSPITAL, ROAD HARAPPANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT-583131. …PETITIONER (BY SMT/MISS. BABY YADAV .B, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MARUTHI .S, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSION COURT DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT HOSPETE, VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT-583201. REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR. 2. AKKAMAHADEVI DODDAMANI AGE IN MAJOR WORKING AS FIRST DIVISION ASSISTANT CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT KUDLGI. Digitally signed by CHAITHRA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010515602026 NC: 2026:KHC:44340 WP No. 23401 of 2026 VIJAYANAGAR DISTRICT-583135. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT/MISS. KRUTHIKA RAGHAVAN, ADVOCATE FOR R1) THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE MEMO BEARING NO. DIS.NO.2094/2026/ADM DATED 25.06.2026, VIDE ANNEXURE-J, IN SO FAR AS IT RELLATED TO THE PETITIONER AND 2ND RESPONDET ARE CONCERNED FOR POST OF SHIRASTEDAR/BENCH CLERK GRADE-II UNDER THE RESIDUAL CADRE AND ALSO QUASHING THE COMMUNICATION LETTER DATED 17.07.2026 VIDE ANNEXURE-L, IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO THE PETITIONER AND 2ND RESPONDENT ARE CONCERNED AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter for sometime seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition. 2. Memo is placed on record. 3. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19