Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32413 (PNJ)

SANDEEP KAUR THROUGH SPA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/39748/2026 · 2026-07-21

Virinder Aggarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.22 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-39748-2026 -2- CRM-M-39752-2026 CRM-M-39760-2026 file a petition before a Court of law, including the Constitutional Court, through a Special Power of Attorney. 2. Another issue which arises for consideration is that the memo of parties does not disclose the current residential addresses of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners have not disclosed their present whereabouts despite approaching this Constitutional Court. Further, the Special Power of Attorney, on the basis of which the present petitions have been filed, contains a vague recital that it has been executed for the purpose of getting the FIRs quashed; however, no details of the FIRs sought to be quashed have been mentioned therein. 3. At this stage, counsel for the petitioner(s) intends to withdraw these petitioner with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars. 4. Ordered accordingly. 5. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. 6. A photocopy of this order be placed on the files of other connected cases. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 21st July, 2026 JUDGE S. Pathania Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.22 16:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document