201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-3050-2026 Date of decision: 01.05.2026 PRATEEK ...PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Divij Datt, Advocate and Mr. Komal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Surender Singh Pannu, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Budhiraja, Advocate for respondent Nos.2. **** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (ORAL) 1. By way of the present petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No.141 dated 14.11.2025 registered under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 324(4), 309(6) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNS’) at Police Station Bhupani, District Faridabad. 2. In the present matter, a compromise has been effected between the parties. Petitioner along with co-accused has approached this Court by way of filing a petition bearing CRM-M-7466-2026 (O & M) titled as ‘Prateek and others vs. State of Haryana and others’ for quashing of present FIR on the basis of said compromise, which has been allowed vide order of even date. 3. In view of the above, present petition stands disposed of as having been rendered as infructuous. (SUBHAS MEHLA) May 01, 2026 JUDGE manisha (i) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No (ii) Whether reportable Yes/No MANISHA 2026.05.05 18:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document