KISHORE KUMAR NAYAK v. THE DISTRICT JUDGE, CUTTACK
WP(C)/17212/2026 · 2026-08-29
Manash Ranjan Pathak, Murahari Sri Raman
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32408 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 32408 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.17212 of 2026 (CNR No. ODHC010349332026)
Kishore Kumar Nayak & Others …. Petitioners Represented By Adv.- Mr. Umakanta Mishra, Advocate -versus-
The District Judge, Cuttack & Another …. Opp. Parties Represented By Adv.- Mr. Satyabrata Mohanty, AGA
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
Order No.
ORDER 29.08.2026 (Hybrid mode)
01.
1. It is submitted by Mr. Umakanta Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner that the Writ Petition contains fatal defects, which cannot be cured. Hence, in the midst of hearing, he sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Petition, which has been filed by many employees joined together. Seeking liberty to approach this Court by filing individual cases to ventilate grievance of respective petitioners, a Memo has been filed which is taken on record.
2. Leave is granted to the Petitioner to withdraw the present Writ Petition with liberty as sought for. p. 2
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
4. Pending Interlocutory application(s), if any, stand(s)
disposed of.
(Manash Ranjan Pathak) Judge
(Murahari Sri Raman) Judge
Ranjeeta