IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21018 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-741 Year-2025 Thana- FATEHPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== Chandan Yadav @ Chandan Kumar Son of Mahendra Yadav Resident of Village- Meyari, P.S.- Fatehpur, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 2 08-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 741 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 76, 3(5) of BNS. 3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 12.11.2025 at about 5:15 P.M., the informant was at his house with his family when all the named accused persons arrived armed with lathi, danda, and iron rods and started abusing and assaulting the informant’s son, Krishna Yadav. When other family members intervened, they were also beaten. The petitioner assaulted Krishna Yadav on his head, causing him to fall unconscious, while co-accused Kamleshwari Devi assaulted the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21018 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026 2/2 informant’s daughter-in-law with bricks and thereafter, the petitioner outraged her modesty. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated. There is delay of four days in lodging the FIR. There is land dispute between the parties. 5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 6. There is direct specific allegation against the petitioner Chandan Yadav @ Chandan Kumar of having assaulted the informant’s son with iron rod and of outraging the modesty of the informant’s daughter-in-law. Considering the seriousness of the allegation, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the bail petition is rejected. kundan/- (Alok Kumar Sinha, J) U T