1 ( 2026:JHHC:2162-DB ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (PIL) No. 4586 of 2023 Rajesh Kumar Singh, aged about 46 years, son of Late Prabhu Nath Singh, resident of Hawai Nagar, P.O.- Hatia, P.S.- Jagarnathpur, District- Ranchi. Jharkhand-834004. …. Petitioner Versus 1. The Union of India 2. The Secretary, Department of Power, Government of India, having its office at Shram Shakti Bhawan, Rafi Marg, P.O.& P.S.- Sansad Marg, District- New Delhi-110001. 3. The Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, P.O.- Jagarnathpur, P.S.- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi. 4. The Finance Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Jharkhand, HEC, Administrative Building, P.O.- Jagarnathpur, P.S.- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi. 5. The Secretary, Department of Energy, Government of Jharkhand, HEC, Administrative Building, P.O.- Jagarnathpur, P.S.- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi. 6. The Chairman, Jharkhand State Electric Regulatory Commission, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Near Housing Board Office, Harmu, P.O.& P.S.- Argora, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 7. Central Bureau of Investigation through its Director, having its office at CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, P.O. & P.S.- Lodhi Road, District- New Delhi. 8. Enforcement Directorate through its Director, having its office at Pravartan Bhawan, A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Road, P.O., P.S. & District- New Delhi. …. Respondents ------ CORAM : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Raj, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Piyush Chitresh, AC to AG For the E.D. : Mr. A.K. Das, Advocate Mr. Shivam Utkarsh Sahay, Advocate ----- 19/ 28.01.2026 The petitioner, in the purported public interest, was challenging the extension granted to the Managing Directors, Executive Directors, Directors of all State Electricity Companies (PSUs). However, it was found that none of the parties, whose services were extended, were impleaded as respondent in this petition. 2 2. Therefore, on 16.01.2026, we had adjourned the matter to enable the learned counsel for the petitioner to consider his position. 3. Today, Mr. Raj, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction from the petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings before the appropriate Forum, if the petitioner’s grievance still survives. 4. Accordingly, we grant leave with liberty, as prayed for. 5. This petition is disposed of, with liberty, as prayed for. All contentions of all parties are, however, left open, because we have not examined the matter of extension on merits. Pending I.As. stand disposed of. (M.S. Sonak, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) January 28, 2026 Ranjeet / R.Kr. Uploaded on 30.01.2026