Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32398 (KAR)

MANJUNATHA B v. MRS. CHANDRASHEKARAMMA

WP/26097/2024 · 2026-08-03

Lalitha Kanneganti

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010556592024 NC: 2026:KHC:40513 WP No. 26097 of 2024 C/W WP No. 26212 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 26097 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 26212 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) IN WP No. 26097/2024 BETWEEN: 1. MANJUNATHA B S/O M V BANGARAIAH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT MEDAHALLI EXTENSION VIRGONAGAR POST BENGLAURU - 560 049 2. ANIL KUMAR N S/O B N NARAYANASWAMY AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT BEHIND URDU SCHOOL MEDAHALLI EXTENSION VIRGONAGAR POST BENGLAURU - 560 049 3. KRISHNAPPA S/O MUNIPAPAIAH AGED 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.21, VEERANAHALLI VIRGONAGAR POST BENGALURU EAST TALUK-560049 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR C., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010556592024 NC: 2026:KHC:40513 WP No. 26097 of 2024 C/W WP No. 26212 of 2024 AND: 1. MRS. CHANDRASHEKARAMMA D/O LATE SHIVANNA W/O SHIVARUDRAIAH AGED 76 YEARS, 2. SHIVARUDRAIAH S/O LATE EDYRUAPPA AGED 93 YEARS, 3. SWAMY S K S S/O SHIVARUDRAIAH Y AGED 59 YEARS, 4. SHIVAPRASAD S/O SHIVARUDRAIAH AGED 56 YEARS, 5. SHIVAMURTHY S S/O SHIVARUDRAIAH Y AGED 45 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT NO.49 MEDAHALLI EXTENSION, VIRGONAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 049 …RESPONDENTS (R1 TO R5 ARE SERVED) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO WHEREFORE, THE PETITIONERS HUMBLY PRAY THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN O.S.NO.1642/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, AT BENGALURU AND ETC. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010556592024 NC: 2026:KHC:40513 WP No. 26097 of 2024 C/W WP No. 26212 of 2024 IN WP NO. 26212/2024 BETWEEN: 1. MANJUNATHA B S/O M V BANGARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT MEDAHALLI EXTENSION, VIRGONAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 049 2. ANIL KUMAR N S/O B N NARAYANASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT BEHIND URDU SCHOOL, MEDAHALLI EXTENSION, VIRGONAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 049 3. KRISHNAPPA S/O MUNIPAPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.21, VEERANAHALLI, VIRGONAGAR POST, BENGALURU EAST TALUK - 560 049 ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MRS. CHANDRASHEKARAMMA D/O LATE SHIVANNA, S/O SHIVARUDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, 2. SHIVARUDRAIAH S/O LATE EDYRUAPPA, AGED ABOUT 93 YEARS, 3. SWAMY S K S - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010556592024 NC: 2026:KHC:40513 WP No. 26097 of 2024 C/W WP No. 26212 of 2024 S/O SHIVARUDRAIAH Y, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, 4. SHIVAPRASAD S/O SHIVARUDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 5. SHIVAMURTHY S S/O SHIVARUDRAIAH Y AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO.49, MEDAHALLI EXTENSION, VIRGONAGAR POST, BENGALURU-560049 ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA REDDY T., ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN OS NO. 1642/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, AT BENGALURU, QUASH THE ORDER DATED 17.09.2024 (ANNEXURE-F) PASSED ON IA NO. 1 UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 R/W SEC 151 OF CPC IN OS NO. 1642/2024, FILED BY THE PETITIONERS/PLAINTIFFS AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS, ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, AT BENGALURU, WHEREIN THE HONBLE COURT HAS REFUSED TO GRANT AN EX-PARTE ORDER OF TEMPORARY INJUNCTION AND ORDERED TO ISSUE NOTICES ON IA -1 TO THE RESPONDENTS, BY A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, DIRECTION OR ORDER, CONSEQUENTLY. THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010556592024 NC: 2026:KHC:40513 WP No. 26097 of 2024 C/W WP No. 26212 of 2024 ORAL ORDER A memo is filed stating that the suit itself has been withdrawn on the ground that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, nothing survives for consideration in these writ petitions. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Pending IAs, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3