20.08.2026 Court No.551 Item No.5, 9 & 18 tbsr CRM (A) 2401 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Tamluk P.S. Case No. 389 of 2026 dated 04.06.2026 under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/329(4)/351(2)/110/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. And In the matter of: SAJADA BIBI @ SAJEDA BIBI AND ANR. ….Petitioners. With CRM (A) 2431 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Tamluk P.S. Case No. 389 of 2026 dated 04.06.2026 under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/329(4)/351(2)/110/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. And In the matter of: SK. RAMJAN @ SK. RAMJAN ALI AND ANR. ….Petitioners. With CRM (A) 2463 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Tamluk P.S. Case No. 389 of 2026 dated 04.06.2026 under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/329(4)/351(2)/110/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. And In the matter of: SK JAKIR ALI @ SHEKH JAKIR ALI ….Petitioner. Mr. Navanil De Mr. Subhrajit De …for the petitioners in all three matters. Mr. Somnath Adhikari Mr. Anirudha Sarkar …..for the State in CRM (A) 2401 of 2026. Mr. Aniruddha Bhattacharya Ms. Priti Kar Bagchi …..for the State in CRM (A) 2431 of 2026. Mr. Somnath Bera …..for the State in CRM (A) 2463 of 2026. 1. Memo of evidence filed on behalf of the State is taken on record. 2 2. Three anticipatory bail applications are taken up together as they emanate from the selfsame police case. 3. It is submitted by the learned advocate for the petitioners that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. No incident as narrated in the First Information Report ever took place. The petitioners have been implicated in this case due to long pending property disputes. He prays for anticipatory bail. 4. On the other hand, learned advocates appearing for the State refers to the memo of evidence as well as material in the case diary including the injury report. They oppose the prayer for anticipatory bail. 5. Having considered the submissions made on behalf of the parties and on perusal of the materials in the case diary, it transpires that the petitioners along with other FIR-named accused persons used filthy languages aimed at the complainant. They are also alleged to have ransacked the household articles over the issue of previous grudge. The de facto complainant raised protest. The de facto compliant was assaulted by the petitioners. The injury report contained in the case diary shows a ‘history of assault in the neighborhood’. However, the name the assailants have not been disclosed before the Medical Officer. The nature of the injuries has not been classified as grievous. 6. In such circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners in all three matters. 3 7. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners in all the three matters shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS and on further condition that the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 in CRM(A) 2431 of 2026 and the petitioner in CRM(A) 2463 of 2026 shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a fortnight till the conclusion of investigation, the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 in CRM(A) 2401 of 2026 shall cooperate with investigation till conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. 8. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is allowed. 9. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with requisite formalities. (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)