Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
D/L2 13.08.2026 Bpg.
C.R.M. (A) 2425 of 2026
In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023;
Siddik Ali Mia Versus The State of West Bengal
Mr. Kausik Bandopadhyay. …for the petitioner.
Mr. Pritam Roy Mr. Prosenjit Ghosh. …for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that there has been change of circumstances and he is not willing to proceed with the application for anticipatory bail.
Learned advocate for the State is present.
Accordingly, CRM(A) 2425 of 2026 is dismissed as not pressed.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
2