Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32392 (PAT)

Arun Ray @ Arjun Ray v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./5145/2026 · 2026-02-03

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5145 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-241 Year-2025 Thana- NADI P.S. District- Patna ====================================================== 1. Arun Ray @ Arjun Ray S/o Late Krishna Ray R/o vill - Gadhochak, P.S.- Nadi, Distt.- Patna 2. Munna Kumar S/o Shri Bhagwan Ray @ Bhagwan Ray R/o vill - Gadhochak, P.S.- Nadi, Distt.- Patna 3. Vikash Kumar S/o Shri Bhagwan Ray @ Bhagwan Ray R/o vill - Gadhochak, P.S.- Nadi, Distt.- Patna 4. Akash Kumar S/o Ram Ray @ Shri Ram Ray R/o vill - Gadhochak, P.S.- Nadi, Distt.- Patna 5. Shriram Ray @ Ram Ray S/o Late Laddu Ray @ Laddu Ray R/o vill - Gadhochak, P.S.- Nadi, Distt.- Patna 6. Rambabu Ray S/o Late Laddu Ray @ Laddu Ray R/o vill - Gadhochak, P.S.- Nadi, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jay Ram Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Bhushan, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 03-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. Prosecution case, in brief, is that on 29.8.25 at about 6:45 AM, when informant was going to purchase fodder Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5145 of 2026(2) dt.03-02-2026 2/3 from the shop of Rambriksh Ji, on the way, these petitioners stopped informant, abused and assaulted him by means of lathi, danda. It is further alleged that petitioner no. 4 fired upon informant. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Both parties are close-relatives and descendants of common ancestor. It is further submitted that on account of land dispute, for which Title Suit No. 137 of 2025 is already pending between the parties, altercation took place in which both parties inflicted injury on each other. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and there is no specific allegation of overt act against these petitioners. Though there is allegation of firing against petitioner no. 4 but no one sustained any firearms injury. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Considering nature of accusation, relationship between the parties and the fact that no one sustained any firearms injury, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5145 of 2026(2) dt.03-02-2026 3/3 of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna City, Patna in connection with Nadi P. S. Case No. 241 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T