Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3239 (PAT)

Bali Paswan v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./10794/2026 · 2026-04-23

Purnendu Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10794 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-308 Year-2017 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1. Bali Paswan S/o Ganesh Paswan 2. Shadhu Paswan S/o Shiv Sunder Paswan 3. Chhotelal Paswan @ Chhotelal Hajra S/o Roshan Paswan All are R/o Village - Madhopur Katahariya, P.S - Turkauliya, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhannjay Kumar II, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 23-04-2026 Heard Mr. Dhannjay Kumar II, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 308 of 2017 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 323, 325, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the accused persons named therein including the petitioners assaulted the informant and his family members, with an intention to kill, causing injuries. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10794 of 2026(3) dt.23-04-2026 2/3 petitioners submitted that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioners and informant side are gotia and they indulged into free fight due to admitted land dispute and for the same, there is case and counter case between the parties, in which both the sides sustained injuries. The injury attribuatble to the petitioners is not on the vital part of the body of the injured. Petitioners have clean antecedents. On these grounds, the petitioners seek to be released on pre-arrest bail. 5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail. 6. Having heard the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, having perused the allegation made in the FIR and the fact that there is case and counter case between the parties and the injuries attributable to the petitioners being not on the vital part of the body, the petitioners, above named, who are having clean antecedents, are directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Motihari, East Champaran at Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10794 of 2026(3) dt.23-04-2026 3/3 Motihari / Concerned Court in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 308 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. 8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force. Sanjay/- (Purnendu Singh, J) U T