Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3239 (JHR)

JUGNU ENTERPRISES v. CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD. And ORS

WPC/438/2011 · 2026-04-01

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:9362 1 W.P.(C) No. 432 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI ---- W.P.(C) No. 438 of 2011 ---- Jugnu Industries, having its factory at Village Bhishampur, Krishnarpan, PO Chakiya, Dist. Chandauli (UP) through its proprietor Subash Giri, son of late R.B. Giri, resident of Flat No.13 Block-III, Rajshree Apartment Aashiyana Complex, Sindhgiri Bagh, Varanasi (UP) …. .... Petitioner(s) -- Versus -- 1.Central Coalfields Limited, a subsidiary of Coal India Limited, Darbhanga House, PS Kotwali, District Ranchi, through its Chairman Cum Managing Director 2.The Chairman Cum Managing Director, Central Coalfields Limited, Darbhanga House, PS Kotwali, District Ranchi 3.The General Manager, (Sales and Marketing), Central Coalfields Limited, Darbhanga House, P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi 4.The Deputy Chief Sales Manager (RS) Sales and Marketing Division, Central Coalfields Limited, Darbhanga House, P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi 5.The SOM (RS) Sales and Marketing Division, Central Coalfields Limited, Darbhanga House, PS Kotwali, District Ranchi …… ….. .... Respondents ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner(s) :- Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Resp.-CCL :- Mr. Anoop Kumar Mehta, Advocate ---- 6/01.04.2026 Heard Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sinha, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anoop Kumar Mehta, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent -Central Coalfields Limited (CCL). 2. The prayer in this writ petition is made for commanding upon the respondent Central Coalfields Limited /CCL to refund to the 2026:JHHC:9362 2 W.P.(C) No. 432 of 2011 petitioner the 20 % increased basic price having charged/ paid in excess of the notified price of the linked quantity of coal for the period January 2007 to April 2008 together with the interest to be calculated from the date of deposit till the date of actual payment. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent CCL jointly submit that the subject matter was before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (SLP) (Civil) No.21888 of 2012 subsequently which has been registered as Civil Appeal No.11793 of 2025 and the said appeal was preferred by Coal India Ltd and others against M/s Rahul Industries and others reported in 2025 SCC OnLine 1963 whereby the order of the High Court has been set aside and the appeal has been allowed meaning thereby, 20% is not to be refunded by the CCL to the coal consumers. 4. In light of the above order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, there is nothing to be decided in the present writ petition and the case of the petitioner is covered in light of the said judgment. 5. As such, this writ petition is dismissed. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated : 01.04.2026 SI/