Dilip Kumar @ Dilip Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./11865/2026 · 2026-04-24
Prabhat Kumar Singh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3237 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3237 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11865 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-134 Year-2017 Thana- FATUA District- Patna ====================================================== Dilip Kumar @ Dilip Kumar Singh Son of Raghunandan Singh R/O Vill.- Shivchak, P.S.- Fatuha, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate For the State : Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 24-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 354, 307, 427, 337, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. As per F.I.R., it is alleged that this petitioner caused fire arm injury in the chest of brother of informant, namely Pankaj Kumar. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11865 of 2026(3) dt.24-04-2026 2/3 As a matter of fact, on account of petty dispute, altercation took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. Though, as per F.I.R., this petitioner caused fire arm injury in the chest of Pankaj Kumar, however, during investigation, injured Pankaj Kumar in his statement recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. has stated that it was co-accused Mangru @ Bablu @ Manoj Kumar who fired upon him. Moreover, charge-sheet has already been submitted and petitioner, having no criminal antecedents, is in custody since 21.11.2025. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, materials that have surfaced during investigation, statement of the injured recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. and clean antecedents, the prayer for grant bail of to the petitioner is allowed. 7. Accordingly, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-II, Patna City, Patna in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11865 of 2026(3) dt.24-04-2026 3/3 connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No. 134 of 2017.
shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T