Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32368 (MAD)

T.MUTHUSAMY v. DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/19836/2026 · 2026-06-09

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 19836 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 19836 of 2026 1. T.Muthusamy 2. T. Murugesan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. District Collector, Collectorate, Tiruppur -641 604. 2. The Tahsildar, Udumalaipettai Taluk Office, Tiruppur -642126. 3. The District Revenue Officer, District Collectorate, Tiruppur -641 604. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Udumalaipettai Taluk Office, Tiruppur -642126. 5. The Village Administrative Officer, Athukinathupatti Village, Udumalaipettai Taluk, Tiruppur District -642 206. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the First Respondent to consider the petitioners’ petition dated 02.12.2024 vide reference 10575981 forthwith and direct the Fourth Respondent to implement the order bearing No.N.M.NO.2065/2024/A3 dated 18.09.2024 and consequently effect mutation and change of patta in respect of the land measuring 0.20.5 hectares comprised https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19836 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 in patta No.379, S.F. No.188/1 in the names of the petitioners. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Mohammed Rithick For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Government’s Counsel ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioners’ representation dated 02.12.2024. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have made a representation dated 02.12.2024 before the respondents to implement the order bearing No.N.M.No.2065/2024/A3 dated 18.09.2024 and consequently effect mutation and change of patta in respect of the land measuring 0.20.5 hectares comprised in patta No.379, S.F. No.188/1 in the names of the petitioners. However, the said representation was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition. 3. Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government’s Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and submitted that the petitioners’ representation dated 02.12.2024 will be considered within a period of eight weeks. 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19836 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 5. Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the second respondent to dispose of the petitioners’ representation dated 02.12.2024, after issuing due notice to the petitioner and other aggrieved persons, if any, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 09-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19836 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 To: 1. District Collector, Collectorate, Tiruppur -641 604. 2. The Tahsildar, Udumalaipettai Taluk Office, Tiruppur -642126. 3. The District Revenue Officer, District Collectorate, Tiruppur -641 604. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Udumalaipettai Taluk Office, Tiruppur -642126. 5. The Village Administrative Officer, Athukinathupatti Village, Udumalaipettai Taluk, Tiruppur District -642 206. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19836 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM WP No. 19836 of 2026 09-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis