Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32364 (KAR)

VEDA VIGNAN MAHA VIDYA PEETH v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/24414/2026 · 2026-08-06

Suraj Govindaraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010539352026 NC: 2026:KHC:41592 WP No. 24414 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 24414 OF 2026 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: VEDA VIGNAN MAHA VIDYA PEETH REGISTERED OFFICE, AT NO.19, 39TH A CROSS, 11TH MAIN ROAD, 14TH T BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 041 REP. BY ITS ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER BALAJI V, AGED 52 YEARS ALSO AT 21ST KM, KANAKAPURA ROAD, UDAYAPURA POST, BENGALURU SOUTH. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B.S. RAGHU PRASAD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF HOME VIKAS SOUDHA, VIDHANA VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001 BY ITS HOME SECRETARY. 2. DIRECTOR AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU - 1. Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010539352026 NC: 2026:KHC:41592 WP No. 24414 of 2026 3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SH17, HAJI NAGAR, VIJAYA NAGAR, RAMANAGARA, KARNATAKA - 562 159. 4. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SH17, HAJI NAGAR, VIJAYA NAGAR, RAMANAGARA, KARNATAKA - 562 159. 5. KAGGALIPURA POLICE STATION, RG25 HCR, KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD, KAGGALIPURA, BENGALURU - 560 082 REP. BY ITS POLICE INSPECTOR. 6. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU SOUTH KANDAYA BHAVAN, K G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009. 7. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU SOUTH KANDAYA BHAVAN, K G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009. 8. SAMATHA SAINIKA DALA 11TH MAIN, 4TH BLOCK, AUROBINDO MARG, PATTABHIRAMA NAGAR, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 011 REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT DR. M.VENKATASWAMY REGISTERED K.C.S ACT 1860. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PANINI A.H, AGA FOR R1 AND R7) - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010539352026 NC: 2026:KHC:41592 WP No. 24414 of 2026 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO INITIATE ACTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW ON THE COMPLAINT DATED 24-07-2026 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-D2 GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER AS AGAINST 8TH RESPONDENT AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent nos.1 to 7. 2. Notice to respondent no.8 is dispensed with in view of the proposed order to be passed. 3. Petitioner is before the court seeking for the following releifs: a. Issue a writ of mandamus directing the 5th respondent to initiate action in accordance with law on the complaint dated 24.07.2026 produced as Annexure-D given by the petitioner as against 8th respondent. b. Issue such other writ or directions as this Hon'ble Court deems fit. c. Direct the respondents to pay costs of the writ petition. - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010539352026 NC: 2026:KHC:41592 WP No. 24414 of 2026 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that a complaint lodged by the petitioner in terms of Annexure-D2 on 24.07.2026 has not been acted upon. The allegations made in the said complaint is that the members of respondent no.8 had indulged in a protest in front of the premises of the petitioner, alleging that the petitioner has violated the lease granted to the petitioner and certain other allegations. 5. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that since the jurisdictional police did not take any action, the petitioner has also submitted a representation on 24.07.2026 at Annexure-F2 enclosing the said complaint, despite which no action has been taken. 6. Subsequently, on 30.07.2026, the petitioner has also submitted a representation to the next higher officer, namely, respondent no. 2, who has also not taken any action. 7. A perusal of the complaint would indicate that the allegations made are in respect of non-cognizable offences which at most, constitute unlawful assembly. Such being the case, it is not required for the respondents to register a FIR in respect of a non- cognizable offence. - 5 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010539352026 NC: 2026:KHC:41592 WP No. 24414 of 2026 8. The petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing a necessary private complaint on account of the Station House officer as also the superior authority not taking any action in terms of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Priyanka Srivastava & Another vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Others reported in (2015) 6 SCC 287 . 9. Reserving such liberty, the petition stands disposed. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE GJM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23