Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010035942026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/551/2026 BINOY KR RABHA S/O LATE DURJYADHAM RABHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- UDAYPUR, THEKASU PT. II P.O. P.S.- DUDHNOIDISTRICT- GOALPARA, ASSAM,PIN- 783124. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, HOME AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006. 2:DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE B.K. KAKATI ROAD ULUBARI GUWAHATI-781007. 3:SR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CITY GUWAHATI MG ROAD PAN BAZAAR GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN- 781001 4:SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE BONGAIGAON CHAPAGURI ROAD NEW COLONY MAHABIRSTAN BAKHORAPARAB PT- I BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN- 783380 Page No.# 2/4 5:SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KOKRAJHAR KOKRAJHAR ASSAM PIN- 78337 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H DAS, D BARUAH Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, Linked Case : WP(C)/4455/2024 BINOY KR RABHA S/O- LATE DURJYADHAM RABHA R/O- VILLAGE- UDAYPUR THEKASU PART II P.O- AND P.S- DUDHNOI DIST- GOALPARA ASSAM PIN-783124 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM HOME AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT SACHIVALAYA DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006. 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI- 781007. 3:SR. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE CITY Page No.# 3/4 GUWAHATI MG ROAD PAN BAZAAR GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN-781001 4:SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE BONGAIGAON CHAPAGURI ROAD NEW COLONY MAHABIRSTAN BAKHORAPARAB PART I BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN-783380 5:SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KOKRAJHAR ASSAM PIN-783370 6:TAPAN DAS S/O- LATE INDRAMOHAN DAS R/O- VILLAGE OXIGURI P.S- BIJNI DIST- BONGAIGAON. ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR H DAS Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER 30.03.2026 Heard Mr. H. Das, learned counsel for the applicant and also heard Mr. P. Borah, learned State Counsel for all the respondents. This is an application seeking striking off the respondent no. 6 who has Page No.# 4/4 reportedly expired. Having considered that the respondent has reportedly expired during the pendency of the connected writ petition being WP(C)/4455/2024 and as consented to by learned counsel for the parties, I deemed it appropriate to allow this application. Accordingly, the name of the respondent no. 6 stands struck off from the array of parties. The Interlocutory application accordingly stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant