Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32349 (PNJ)

VIKAS DAHIYA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/17987/2026 · 2026-07-21

Subhas Mehla, Vikas Bahl

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

115 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17987-2026 Date of decision: 21.07.2026 VIKAS DAHIYA ...PETITIONER V/S STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Sandeep Balhara, Advocate for the petitioner. (through video conferencing) Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. This civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus/certiorari or passing any other order/direction quashing the letter vide memo No.: CVO: HSIIDC: 2025:119, dated: 28.11.2025 (Annexure P-24) passed by the Chief Vigilance Officer, HSIIDC, Vigilance Department, Haryana and impugned memo No. HSIIDC/IPD/2025/1621, dated: 08.12.2025 (Annexure P-25) passed by Chief Town Planner (HQ) for Haryana State Indl. & Infra. Dev. Corporation Ltd. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that against the order dated 08.12.2025, the petitioner has filed appeals to the Managing Director, HSIIDC, Panchkula, Haryana (Annexures P-27 to P-29) and has submitted that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to pursue the said appeal. MANISHA 2026.07.22 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-17987-2026 2 3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) July 21, 2026 JUDGE Manisha (i) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No (ii) Whether reportable Yes/No MANISHA 2026.07.22 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document