1 CGHC010107212026 2026:CGHC:35930 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2569 of 2026 Dr. Ishwari Brijwasi Suryawanshi W/o Dr. Jainendra Kumar Suryawanshi Aged About 46 Years Posted As Assistant Professor Political Science) In The Collage Of The Government Tcl Pg Collage Janjgir, District Janjgir_champa, R/o Government Tcl Pg College Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa (Cg)pin 495668 . Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Higher Education Department, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur (Cg) Pin 492002 2 - Commissiners Officer Incharge In The Commissioner Of The Higher Education Department Block-3 Indrawati Bahwan Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur (Cg)492002 3 - The Principal The Government Tcl Pg College Janjgir, District Janjgir- Champa (Cg) Pin 495668 Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Tejaswi Mandavi, Advocate For Resp/State : Mr. Sahil Singh, PL (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 13/08/2026 1. The petitioner has called in question the order dated 19.07.2024 passed by respondent No.2 as well as the consequential recovery proceedings initiated against the petitioner pursuant thereto. RAHUL JHA Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2026.08.14 10:46:16 +0530 2 2. The controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the common order dated 30.07.2026 passed by this Court in WPS No.6505/2024 and connected matters, whereby the challenge to the corrigendum dated 25.06.2024 and the consequential action for refixation of pay and recovery of excess payment has already been considered and rejected. 3. In view of the aforesaid judgment, no separate consideration is required in the present writ petition. The petitioner has failed to establish any enforceable right to claim three advance increments contrary to the governing statutory framework. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed in terms of the common order dated 30.07.2026 passed in WPS No.6505/2024 and connected matters. 5. Consequently, any interim order operating in favour of the petitioner shall stand vacated. Sd/- Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Rahul