Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3234 (GAU)

SRI PRADIP KR DUTTA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS.

Crl.Pet./143/2026 · 2026-02-11

Mitali Thakuria

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010019032026 2026:GAU-AS:2012 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./143/2026 SRI PRADIP KR DUTTA S/O LATE DEBANANDA DUTTA, RESIDENT OF JUNAKI NAGAR, DHULIAPAR, P.O. DHULIAPAR, P.S. DISTRICT-SIVASAGAR, ASSAM, PIN- 785640. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM 2:SMTI RINKU HAZARIKA D/O SRI NILA KANTA HAZARIKA RESIDENT OF 2 NO. HOLOGURI GAON P.S. DISTRICTSIVASAGAR ASSAM 3:SRI NILA KANTA HAZARIKA S/O LATE GAJENDRA HAZARIKA RESIDENT OF 2 NO. HOLOGURI GAON P.S. DISTRICT-SIVASAGAR ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR B BURAGOHAIN, MR. P K GOGOI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA Page No.# 2/2 ORDER Date : 12-02-2026 Heard Mr. P.K. Gogoi, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, the learned Addl. PP appearing on behalf of State respondent. It is submitted by Mr. Gogoi that due to some formal defects in mentioning the sections in the Cause Title of the petition he wants to withdraw the same with a liberty to file afresh and that apart he submitted that two documents could not be annexed at the time of filing the criminal petition. He submitted that the application has been filed u/s 528 read with Section 442 of BNSS which ought to have been filed u/s 528 read with Section 438 of BNSS. Mr. Borthakur has no objection to that regard. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner prayer for withdrawal of the petition with a liberty to file afresh is hereby allowed. Criminal petition is accordingly disposed of on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant