IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5184 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-358 Year-2025 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1. Munnilal Yadav @ Munnilal @ Kaushal Kumar S/o Mahendra Rai @ Mahendra Roy @ Mahendra Yadav R/o Village - Gidhona, P.S - Ghorasahan, District - East Champaran 2. Chhotelal Yadav S/o Mahendra Rai @ Mahendra Roy @ Mahendra Yadav R/o Village - Gidhona, P.S - Ghorasahan, District - East Champaran 3. Sonu Kumar S/o Ganjendra Rai @ Gajendra Ray R/o Village - Gidhona, P.S - Ghorasahan, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Jitendra Kumar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Madhuri Lata, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 03-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 74, 76, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.. 3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, assaulted informant and her family members by means of daab, iron rod and danda. It is further alleged that the accused persons also snatched gold Mangalsutra worth RS. 60,000/- from the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5184 of 2026(2) dt.03-02-2026 2/3 neck of informant. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. Both parties are close relatives of each other and on account of land dispute, a simple maar-peet took place between the parties. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against these petitioners. Rest of the allegations are ornamental in order to make the case grave. Petitioners claim clean antecedents. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed. 7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Sikrahna at Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5184 of 2026(2) dt.03-02-2026 3/3 Dhaka, East Champaran in connection with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 358 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T