Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3232 (UTT)

BABLU RANA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/778/2026 · 2026-04-16

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:2703 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/778/2026 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Narendra Bali, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Yogesh Pandey, Deputy Advocate General and Ms. Swati Verma, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent no. 1. 3. Mr. Pankaj Chaturvedi, Standing Counsel for the Union of India/ respondent no. 2. 4. According to the petitioner, he made a representation to Regional Passport Officer for issuing a passport to him, but, no decision is being taken on that representation. Copy of the representation is enclosed as Annexure-3 to the writ petition, perusal thereof revels that an FIR under Section 302, 34 and 506 IPC was registered against the petitioner in Police Station Pathri, District Haridwar, in which petitioner was convicted and sentenced for life, however, in appeal the Uttarakhand High Court suspended the sentence and released the petitioner on bail. 5. Mr. Pankaj Chaturvedi, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2 submits that because of petitioner’s conviction, passport was not issued to him. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner’s conviction has not attained finality and appeal is still 2026:UHC:2703 pending and his sentence has been suspended, therefore, there is no reason not to issue passport to the petitioner. 7. Learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2 submits that the representation enclosed with the writ petition does not bear any date. He submits that petitioner be permitted to make fresh representation. 8. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of by permitting petitioner to make fresh representation to the Regional Passport Officer within one week from today. It shall be open to him to make such representation, electronically. If he makes representation within stipulated time, decision thereupon shall be taken, within four weeks of its receipt. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 16.04.2026 Navin NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a131bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56D653D095C6ED9A86DAAB 21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2026.04.16 17:35:07 +05'30'