IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1244 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2025 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Hira Ram @ Hira Lal Ram S/o Sahdev Ram R/o Village - Balant, P.S - Baheri, District - Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Baidyanath Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyay ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 27-04-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 76, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent. It is further submitted that Bahuri Devi along with nine others had approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.47588 of 2025 and the same came to be allowed by an order dated 30.07.2025, but then it is submitted that case of the petitioner is not akin to the case of Bahuri Devi and others as in the FIR, there is specific allegation against the petitioner of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1244 of 2026(2) dt.27-04-2026 2/3 assaulting informant’s husband by tangari causing injury on head while Sanjay assaulted her dewar by tangari causing injury on head, but then it is submitted that the injury has been opined to be simple and the blow is not alleged to have been repeated and the date of occurrence is 07.04.2025 and the FIR came to be instituted on 11.04.2025 ie. after delay of four days without any plausible explanation It is also submitted that petitioner is not a criminal and on account of dispute relating to land the occurrence is alleged to have taken place. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application. 5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into the consideration the fact that petitioner is a person with clean and the blow is not alleged to be repeated and the injury has been opined to be simple and the FIR has been instituted after a delay of four days, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail- bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1244 of 2026(2) dt.27-04-2026 3/3 connection with Baheri P. S. Case No.127 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. 6. The application stands allowed. vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T