Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32308 (MAD)

DHANASEKARAN v. THE TAHSILDAR

WP/19764/2026 · 2026-06-09

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 19764 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 19764 of 2026 Dhanasekaran ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Tirupattur District. 2. The Land Surveyor, Kandhili, Tirupattur District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to survey and measure the boundaries of the land of the petitioner property 177/2B, 177/2D, 191/2C2 situated at Thamalerimuthur Village, Tirupattur District by considering the petitioner’s online Application No. 2026/0123/36/000747 dated 17.03.2026. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Premakumari For Respondent(s): Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, Government’s Counsel ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner’s online application dated 17.03.2026. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19764 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made an online application dated 17.03.2026 to survey and measure the boundaries of the land of the petitioner property 177/2B, 177/2D, 191/2C2 situated at Thamalerimuthur Village, Tirupattur District. However, the same was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition. 3. Mr.B.Pachaiyappan, learned Government’s Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and submitted that the petitioner’s application dated 17.03.2026 will be considered within a period of eight weeks. 4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 5. Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the respondents to consider the petitioner's online application dated 17.03.2026 and carry out a survey and complete the process, after giving prior notice to the petitioner and other aggrieved parties, if any, within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19764 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. It is made clear that this order is passed only for the purpose of issuing a direction to the official respondent to conduct a survey and lay boundary stones at the subject land. In the event any dispute arises regarding the possession of the subject property, the same has to be decided by way of filing a suit before the competent Civil Court. 7. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 09-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM To: 1. The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Tirupattur District. 2. The Land Surveyor, Kandhili, Tirupattur District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19764 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM WP No. 19764 of 2026 09-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis