Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3230 (PNJ)

MUSKAAN SHARMA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/4978/2026 · 2026-04-30

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 113 CRWP-4978-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 30.04.2026 Muskaan Sharma and another ...Petitioners VERSUS State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Present :- Mr. Chinku Bawa, Advocate for the petitioner(s). ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The petitioners namely Muskaan Sharma and Gurtej Singh have approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for seeking protection of their lives and personal liberty from the private respondents. The contention of the petitioners is that both are major, aged 26 years and 27 years respectively and they have performed marriage against the wishes of their parents. In support thereof, copy of the Aadhaar Cards pertaining to the petitioners have been appended. The marriage of the petitioners was solemnized on 27.04.2026 at Gurudwara Dashmesh Pita Pathshahi Dasvi Regd., Village Singa Devi, Tehsil Kharar, District Mohali, as per Sikh rites and rituals. A copy of Marriage Certificate (Annexure P-3) issued by the Granthi of the aforesaid Gurudwara has also been appended. The petitioners apprehend threat to their lives and claim that there is a MANGAL SINGH 2026.04.30 18:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 113 CRWP-4978-2026 (O&M) constant danger of them being implicated in a false case. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that a representation dated 27.04.2026 (Annexure P-5) has also been submitted by petitioner No.1 to the respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Fatehgarh Sahib as well as respondent No.3-Station House Officer, Police Station Badali Alla Singh, Fatehgarh Sahib and he confines his prayer that the representation may be examined. Notice of motion restricted to respondents No.1 to 3 only. Pursuant to supply of advance copy, Dr. (Ms.) Savi Nagpal, AAG Punjab has appeared and accepted notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. She submits that she has no objection if appropriate direction for providing requisite protection to the petitioners is given. Having heard the counsel for the parties, the present petition is being disposed of without examining the question of legality and validity of the marriage and expressing any opinion thereon, with a direction to respondent No.3-Station House Officer, Police Station Badali Alla Singh, Fatehgarh Sahib to look into the grievances of the petitioners as set out in the petition and also expressed in the representation dated 27.04.2026 (Annexure P-5) and take appropriate action for protection of their lives and liberty as may be warranted by the circumstances. However, it is clarified that in case any criminal case has been/is registered against the petitioners, nothing in this order shall be construed as a bar for taking appropriate action by the police authorities in respect thereof in accordance with law. MANGAL SINGH 2026.04.30 18:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3 113 CRWP-4978-2026 (O&M) The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order along with copy of the petition and above-said representation to respondent No.3- Station House Officer, Police Station Badali Alla Singh, Fatehgarh Sahib for requisite compliance. Disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) 30.04.2026 JUDGE Mangal Singh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MANGAL SINGH 2026.04.30 18:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document