Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 32295 (PNJ)

JASHANPREET v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/39763/2026 · 2026-07-21

Virinder Aggarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CRM-M-39763-2026 (O&M) IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 124 CRM-M-39763-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 21.07.2026 JASHANPREET ... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973), seeking directions to official respondents to conduct a fair investigation and register FIR against respondents No.4 to 6 and further seeking protection of life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents No.4 to 6. 2. After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioners submitted a representation dated 08.07.2026 (Annexures P4) to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, District Mohali and he would be satisfied if appropriate direction be issued to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, District Mohali to consider and decide representation dated 08.07.2026 (Annexure P-4) moved by petitioners and take necessary action thereupon in a time bound manner in accordance with law. 3. Notice of motion to official respondents only. SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.21 19:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2 CRM-M-39763-2026 (O&M) 4. Mr. J.S. Rattu, learned DAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and submits the needful would be done in due course. 5. Keeping in view the limited prayer made by petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, District Mohali to decide the representation dated 08.07.2026 (Annexure P-8) submitted by petitioner within a period of four weeks’ from today by passing a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law and take appropriate action, if so required. 6. However, if, respondent No.2 does not find any substance in the allegations levelled in the representation, the petitioner shall be informed as per mandate of law. 7. Petition stands disposed of. 8. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 21.07.2026 JUDGE S. Pathania Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SAURAV PATHANIA 2026.07.21 19:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document