Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010284342026
2026:CGHC:34061-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 443 of 2026 Ujjwal Diwan S/o Gaurishankar Diwan Aged About 39 Years R/o Behind Mukbadhir School Kadambari Nagar Durg Dist- Durg (C.G.)
... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Home Secretary Mahanadi Bhavan Mantralaya Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Home Department Through Its Secretary, Mahanadi Bhavan Mantralaya Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Director General of Police Chhattisgarh (D G P) Police Headquarter Sector 19, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Inspector General of Police Durg Range 5 - Superintendent of Police Durg Through Vijay Agrawal Durg (C.G.) 6 - Station House Officer Police Station Supela Vijay Yadav District- Durg (C.G.) 7 - Investigating Officer Assistant Sub Inspector Police Station Supela Durg (C.G.) Rajesh Tiwari 8 - District Magistrate Durg District- Durg (C.G.) 9 - Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Revenue ) Chawani/ Bhilai Nagar District- Durg (C.G.)
... Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : None appears on repeated call For Respondents/State : Mr. Ashish Shukla, Addl. Advocate General ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble
Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
Hon'ble
Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
, Judge
Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 05.08.2026
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers :- ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA
2
“10.1. This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the Istagasha no 75/2026 dated 19.04.2026 criminal proceeding no 347/2026, prepared by the Police station, Supela, Durg against the petitioner. 10.2. This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or direction to take disciplinary action against the respondent. 10.3. This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No. 1/State, taking note of suffering and humiliation caused to the petitioner by granting a sum of Rs. 10,00,000/- (Rupees ten lakhs) towards compensation to petitioner to be paid by the 'State of Chhattisgarh
10.4. To kindly grant any other suitable order or direction as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstance of the case, in the interest of justice.”
2.
Learned State counsel has pointed out that the earlier petition, which was filed by the petitioner being WPCR No. 381 of 2026 for same cause of action, was dismissed as withdrawn because of defect one with cost of Rs.2,000/- and again the present petition has been filed by the petitioner impleading the respondent Nos. 5 to 7 by name though there is no personal allegations levelled against the said respondents. 3. On the repeated calls, learned counsel for the petitioner is not present to press this petition. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra