IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 163 CWP-22091-2026 Date of Decision: 20.07.2026 Sunehara …Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Mr. Ankit Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Bhupender Singh, Additional Advocate General, Haryana TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondents no.2 and 3, Deputy Commissioner and Superintendent of Police, Jind, respectively, to consider and decide the petitioner’s representation dated 08.06.2026, Annexure P-2, filed against respondent no.4/petitioner’s brother, who is employed as Assistant Sub Inspector in the police department, alleging that he is interfering with the petitioner’s possession and preventing him from cultivating the land. 2. Apparently, the petitioner has a dispute with his brother regarding possession of a joint land, for which the appropriate remedy is to approach the Civil Court. 3. The petition, accordingly, stands dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Civil Court, if so advised. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 20.07.2026 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2026.07.22 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment