- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32984 WP No. 19507 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 19507 OF 2026 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: SMT MANJULA W/O MRITHYANUJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O JYOTHI NAGARA, MAGADI TOWN, MAGADI, BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT-562 120. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAMESH K R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HOUSING DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, VISWESHWARAIAH TOWERS, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32984 WP No. 19507 of 2026 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT 562159. 4. THE COMMISSIONER, TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, MAGADI, BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT 562120. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.KENCHE GOWDA., AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI Y D SHIVASHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION, QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 10-04- 2000 BEARING NO. NA.E.66.HAS.99 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT ANNEXURE-F, INSOFAR AS IT RELATES TO THE PETITIONER AND THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IS CONCERNED; B) DIRECTING THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO EFFECT THE E-KHATHA OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER, PURSUANT TO THE REGISTERED SALE DEED DATED 19.01.2013 EXECUTED BY THE PETITIONER'S VENDOR ALIENATING THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER AT ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32984 WP No. 19507 of 2026 ORAL ORDER The petitioner is aggrieved by the Government Order dated 10.04.2000 [Annexure-F], and this order directs cancellation of revenue entries for the petitioner’s property. This impugned order is common to the petitioner's property and the properties of certain other persons. The petitioner asserts that she has purchased the subject property from the legal heirs of Sri. Seenappa, son of Rangaiah, that she has the benefit of the revenue entries but the decision to cancel the revenue entries is on the ground that a certain Sri. Seenappa, son of Rangaiah has availed the benefit of an allotment under the Ashraya Scheme notwithstanding the fact that he owned another immovable property, and that the petitioner is not issued with any notice of the proceedings to cancel the revenue entries. 2. Sri Sunil K N, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Kenche Gowda, a learned Additional - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32984 WP No. 19507 of 2026 Government Advocate who accepts notice for the first to third respondents and Sri Y D Shivashankar, a learned counsel who accepts notice for the fourth respondent, are heard for disposal of this petition in the light of this Court's order dated 20.03.2024 in the writ petition in W.P. No.15943/2022 and connected matters. This Court, in W.P. No.15943/2022 and connected matters, has essentially interfered with the impugned order on the ground that it is without notice or opportunity but observing that the interference cannot foreclose the new proceedings. The petitioner asserts that the impugned order is without notice. Hence, the following. ORDER [a] The petition is allowed. [b] The impugned order dated 10.04.2000 [Annexure-F] is quashed, and the fourth respondent [the Local Authority] is directed to restore the - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:32984 WP No. 19507 of 2026 Khata in favour of the petitioner for her property and issue e-Khata. [c] It is observed that this restoration and issuance of e-Khata would be subject to the outcome of the proceedings that the respondent/s could initiate within a reasonable period of time. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE AN/-