Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
212 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.-
CRM-M-33288-2026 (O&M)
Date of Decision : 21.07.2026
Jasmail Singh
....Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab
....Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SHEKHAWAT
Present: Mr. Ritesh Pandey, Advocate for the petitioner. -.- N.S.SHEKHAWAT J. (Oral)
1.
The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to him in case FIR No.83 dated 17.05.2026, registered under Sections 115(2), 118(2), 3(5) BNS (corresponding Sections 323, 326, 34 IPC) at Police Station City Sekhwan, District Batala (Gurdaspur).
2.
While granting the concession of interim anticipatory bail by this Court on 09.06.2026, the following contentions were noticed by this Court and the same have been reproduced below:-
“Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the parties in the present case are closely related and a minor dispute had taken place over the land of the parties. As per the prosecution version, the petitioner was armed with a dang (stick) and gave a blow with it on the right arm of the complainant and the said injury has been declared to be simple in nature. He further submits that even it is a case of version and cross-version and the question of aggressor is yet to be decided by the Trial Court. Even, Harpal Kaur on the side of the present petitioner also suffered serious injuries on her person, but police did not TRIPTI SAINI 2026.07.22 15:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-33288-2026 (O&M)
-2-
register the FIR against the complainant party in the present case.”
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has reiterated the
submissions and further submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation may not be required.
4.
Learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no longer required for further investigation.
5.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the present petition is allowed and the interim order dated 09.06.2026, passed by this Court is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
6.
Pending application(s), if any, is/are disposed of.
July 21, 2026
(N.S.SHEKHAWAT) tripti
JUDGE
Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking
Whether reportable
: Yes/No TRIPTI SAINI 2026.07.22 15:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document