IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5597 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-391 Year-2025 Thana- MOTIHARI MUFASIL District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1. Brajesh Kumar @ Vijesh Prasad Son of Late Dwarika Prasad Resident of Village - Godhwa, P.S. - Motihari, Muffasil, District - East Champaran. 2. Saheb Kumar Son of Kameshwar Prasad Resident of Village - Godhwa, P.S. - Motihari, Muffasil, District - East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 76, 303(2), 352, 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. As per F.I.R., petitioner no. 1 is alleged to have snatched gold Mangalsutra and petitioner no. 2 along with co- accused Umesh Prasad is alleged to have entered the house of informant, misbehaved with the female family members of informant and committed theft of Rs. 50,000/-. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Both Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5597 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/2 parties are gotiyas and due to long pending land dispute, altercation took place in which both sides inflicted injuries on each other. Specific accusation of assault is against other co- accused persons. Case and counter case. Rest of the allegations are ornamental only to make the case grave. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the nature of accusation, relationship between the parties, case and counter case and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Motihari Muffasil P. S. Case No. 391 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T